The Top 28 Worst Offending Technology Suppliers of 2024
Preface
Nearly all clients are seeking greater prosperity in 2024.
While client organizations are still focused on cost reductions to meet the challenges of their new economic and market realities, the pent-up demands of the business are increasingly calling for innovation, automation, and organizational performance improvement.
Digital Transformation has emerged as the #1 Way to Boost Performance and Savings concurrently. Client organizations that are digitally transforming are harvesting greater value by:
This drives greater innovation, improved organizational performance, and significant cost savings ranging from 25-30% (depending on industry, scope of transformation, maturity of transformation, and the methodology and execution) while at the same time, lowering risk by diversifying and improving the technology supply chain.
NET(net) is the #1 IT Cost and Value Optimization Provider. In the last 20+ years, NET(net) has shaped over $2 Trillion of investment, captured well over $400 Billion of incremental value for our clients and partners, and has an 85% probability of helping you save between 13-53% on your existing and planned IT costs. Our performance numbers are simply unmatched.
Series Description
The ever-evolving landscape of technology is a double-edged sword for businesses. While it unlocks incredible opportunities for innovation, enhanced operational efficiencies, and improved organizational performance, it also presents challenges when it comes to understanding the over-hyped mysticism of these supposed magical solutions that can solve all your problems, and managing the ever-increasing realm of constantly growing IT costs.
Look back on this 4-part blog series, to Parts 1 and 2:
We've equipped you with actionable strategies to fight back and ensure you're getting the most value from your technology investments.
In Part 3, we detail the behaviors of 28 major technology suppliers who are engaging in an unprecedented value-grab, riding the wave of cloud migrations, the SaaSification of all software, inflationary tactics and a host of other issues in an attempt to reset your economic reality. If you thought the price of gas or food or utilities was up – just look at software!
Finally, stay tuned to find out who the worst-of-the-worst is in Part 4
Introduction
The year 2024 has seen a disturbing trend in technology: a growing number of established suppliers have been making unilateral changes to the way they sell and license and have been implementing new, more restrictive policies about how they manage, contract, and support their customers – that seems to prioritize short-term profits over long-term customer satisfaction.
These changes are leading to significant price hikes, disruptions to core functionalities, and a growing sense of betrayal among businesses that rely on these tools for their daily operations. This blog post shines a light on 28 of the worst offending major technology suppliers who are engaging in this behavior in 2024. By exposing these tactics, we hope to empower client organizations to take proactive countermeasures, make informed decisions, and push back against this abuse.
Why This Matters: Rising IT costs are a major concern for enterprises worldwide. A 2024 Gartner report indicates that 67% of CIOs are experiencing budget constraints, despite the increasing need for digital transformation. Unfortunately, many trusted technology suppliers are contributing to this cost pressure by implementing practices that seemingly prioritize profit over customer satisfaction. Understanding these trends empowers client organizations to make informed decisions when selecting and negotiating with the suppliers that comprise their technology supply chains.
This table provides a quick overview of potential cost concerns faced by businesses when using various supplier software models. A legend is provided below the table to define each issue in detail.
Definitions:
The following tables provide a quick overview of potential cost concerns faced by businesses when using various suppliers.
Legend:
Cloud Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) Providers:
Issue |
AWS |
Azure |
GCP |
Subscription Shock |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
Feature Bloat |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
Price Hikes with Static Discounts |
S |
S |
S |
Discount Erosion |
S |
S |
S |
Shrinkflation of Features |
S |
S |
S |
Renewal Price Gouging |
S |
S |
S |
Support Creep |
S |
S |
S |
Auditing Ambiguity |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
Artificial Obsolescence |
S |
S |
S |
Limited Customization Options |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
Additional Considerations:
Software as a Service (SaaS) Providers:
Issue |
Salesforce |
Workday |
ServiceNow |
NetSuite |
Zoom |
Subscription Shock (including runaway consumption charges) |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
Feature Bloat |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
Price Hikes with Static Discounts |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
Discount Erosion |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
Shrinkflation of Features |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
Renewal Price Gouging |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
Support Creep |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
Auditing |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
Artificial Obsolescence |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
Limited Customization Options |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
Additional Considerations:
Data Warehousing as a Service (DaaS) Providers:
Issue |
Databricks |
Snowflake |
Teradata |
Subscription Shock |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
Feature Bloat |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
Price Hikes with Static Discounts |
S |
S |
S |
Discount Erosion |
S |
S |
S |
Shrinkflation of Features |
S |
S |
S |
Renewal Price Gouging |
S |
S |
S |
Support Creep |
S |
S |
S |
Auditing |
S |
S |
S |
Artificial Obsolescence |
S |
S |
S |
Limited Customization Options |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
This list is limited to those who specialize in DaaS as their primary service but could easily include other providers such as AWS (Redshift), Azure (Synapse Analytics), Google (BigQuery), Oracle (Autonomous Data Warehouse), SAP (Data Warehouse Cloud), and IBM (Db2 on Cloud).
Additional Considerations:
Security-as-a-Service (SecaaS) Providers:
Issue |
Crowdstrike |
Okta |
Palo Alto Networks |
Zscaler |
Subscription Shock |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
Feature Bloat |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
Price Hikes with Static Discounts |
S |
S |
S |
S |
Discount Erosion |
S |
S |
S |
S |
Shrinkflation of Features |
S |
S |
S |
S |
Renewal Price Gouging |
S |
S |
S |
S |
Support Creep |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
Auditing |
S |
S |
S |
S |
Artificial Obsolescence |
S |
S |
S |
S |
Limited Customization Options |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
Additional Considerations
Software Publishers:
Issue |
Adobe |
Microsoft |
Oracle |
SAP |
Subscription Shock |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
Feature Bloat |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
Price Hikes with Static Discounts |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
Discount Erosion |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
Shrinkflation of Features |
S |
S |
S |
S |
Renewal Price Gouging |
S |
S |
S |
S |
Support Creep |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
Auditing |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
Artificial Obsolescence |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
Limited Customization Options |
S |
S |
S |
S |
Additional Considerations
Issue |
Cisco |
Fortinet |
Juniper |
McAfee |
Symantec |
Subscription Shock |
S |
S |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
Feature Bloat |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
Price Hikes with Static Discounts |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
Discount Erosion |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
Shrinkflation of Features |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
Renewal Price Gouging |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
Support Creep |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
Auditing |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
Artificial Obsolescence |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
Limited Customization Options |
S |
S |
S |
S |
S |
Additional Considerations
Issue |
Citrix |
IBM |
Nutanix |
VMware |
Subscription Shock |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
Feature Bloat |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
Price Hikes with Static Discounts |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
Discount Erosion |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
Shrinkflation of Features |
S |
S |
S |
S |
Renewal Price Gouging |
S |
S |
S |
S |
Support Creep |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
Auditing |
S |
✔ |
S |
S |
Artificial Obsolescence |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
Limited Customization Options |
✔ |
S |
S |
S |
Additional Considerations
Key Takeaway:
Understanding these potential cost concerns empowers businesses to make informed decisions when selecting and managing supplier software. Careful monitoring of usage, negotiation of terms, and exploration of alternative solutions can help businesses optimize their software investments and avoid unexpected expenses.
Stay Tuned
We hope you enjoyed this blog, outlining the behaviors of 28 major technology suppliers, and the previous installments in parts 1 and 2:
Join us for next month’s installment; the final piece of the puzzle where we reveal the Top 5 ‘Absolute Worst” technology suppliers of 2024. What do you think? Do you have any predictions? How many of yours do you think will be on the list?
Call to Action
NET(net) can help you with all of these technology suppliers and more, so Act Now.
About the Author
Steven C. Zolman is a leading expert in technology investment optimization and the founder, owner, and executive chairman of NET(net), Inc., the world's leading technology investment optimization firm. With over 30 years of industry experience, Mr. Zolman has helped client organizations of all sizes maximize the value of their technology investments by minimizing cost and risk and maximizing the realization of value and benefit.
About NET(net)
Founded in 2002, NET(net) is the world’s leading IT Investment Optimization firm, helping clients find, get, and keep more economic and strategic value in their technology supply chains. Over the last 20 years, NET(net) has influenced trillions of investment, captured hundreds of billions of value, and has helped clients cost and value optimize all major areas of IT Spend, including XaaS, Cloud, Hardware, Software, Services, Healthcare, Outsourcing, Infrastructure, and Telecommunications, among others. NET(net) has the experience you want, demonstrates the expertise that you need, and delivers the performance you demand and deserve. Contact us at info@netnetweb.com, visit us online at www.netnetweb.com, or call us at +1 (616) 546-3100 to see if we can help you capture more value in your IT investments, agreements, deployments, and relationships.
NET(net)’s Website/Blogs/Articles and other content is subject to NET(net)’s legal terms, offered for general information purposes only, and does not constitute legal advice. While NET(net) may offer views and opinions regarding the subject matter, such views and opinions are those of the content authors, are not necessarily reflective of the views of the company and are not intended to malign or disparage any other company or other individual or group.